![il 2 sturmovik battle of stalingrad can i run it il 2 sturmovik battle of stalingrad can i run it](https://news-cdn.softpedia.com/images/news2/IL-2-Sturmovik-Battle-of-Stalingrad-Is-in-Beta-Arrives-on-November-19-441607-2.jpg)
There is no mission editor yet and I hope that when it's released the community will get the plethora of user made campaigns we enjoyed in the original IL2. There have been numerous ideas on the IL2:BoS forum where improvements can be made and I hope 1C/777 look into them. I can live with the unlocks, though I hope they don't continue this trend on further releases. I lead a flight of four and intercept two 111s and maybe one or two 109. The runways are thread bare and lifeless.
#Il 2 sturmovik battle of stalingrad can i run it generator
The campaign generator is just that, but instead of in-depth, living, breathing missions I get quick missions with three access points and minimal enemy interaction. I feel the game is Head and Shoulders above others because the it feels like the campaign has me applying, lathering, rinsing, and repeating over and over again. Where I fault the game (and it is a big fault because I'm a single player) is the campaign. AI is subjective and one man's hard may be another's easy. I don't consider my talent to be expert flyer/marksmen so I do get a challenge from the fighters, but not so much the bombers. Subtle things like the sounds of brake pistons and canopy hatches add to the realism. Most of the sounds are excellent, but as has been noted on several posts, the hit sounds of bullets striking your craft are inconsistent. Flight models? They are very functional and remove my disbelief enough so that I CAN imagine I'm flying a LaGG 3 on the western front. I'm not fond of the cockpits but find that the atmosphere effects and ground details are pretty nice. It's the first thing you notice and for the most part they look satisfactory to very good. Where do I begin with this game? Well the obvious is the graphics. So when 777 Studios was tasked with creating the next iteration of the venerable IL2 I was confident I'd get a quality product that would provide years of entertainment. Eventually a decent campaign system was released and I was a relatively happy camper. It was a product I greatly enjoyed and despite some short falls they weren't anything that affected my enjoyment of the game. I wholeheartedly jumped in based upon my previous experience with 777 Studios' Rise of Flight game. I've been an early access member of the IL2:BoS flight sim since the beginning.
![il 2 sturmovik battle of stalingrad can i run it il 2 sturmovik battle of stalingrad can i run it](https://www.simhq.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Il2-Battle-of-Stalingrad-Update-1.104-New-Campaign-Tanks-1C-Game-Studios-5.jpg)
One thing i learned from all this and hours spent on forums and researching is that i should buy best available CPU, i'm allready saving for i7 6700k skylake or new gen kabylake cpu, and with them you need to buy new motherboard which support ddr4, 1151 socket and ability for overclocking becouse this kind of games demand OC, don't buy something in between it's waste of money (learn from my mistakes), or if you can't affortd new CPU,MOBO and DDR4 just go with i7 4790k (goes on 1150 mobo socket and ddr3), i7 4790k is 10% weaker than i7 6700k in clock speed and this kind of game demands, skylake i7 6700k is new gen cpu and even it seems weaker than i7 4790k it isn't (tested in this kind of games and have 10% better performance) but still very good.OC them above 4GHz and you should have better fps.I've been an early access member of the IL2:BoS flight sim since the beginning. Lately i'm in the same problems with arma and even i5 4690 is weak for this. So if a buya new GTX 1080 keeping my i7 3770k would have same medium performance? :/ yes.this game is based on CPU performance (single thread performance and clock speed).new gpu won't help you a bit, with new gpu like gtx 1080 you would have all graphic settings on ultra but FPS would remain the laggy with tearing. Originally posted by Swam-e:Thanks Blackadder, this is good info.